About Me

My photo
For me it is All About Being of Service & Living the Life of the Give-Away....

Being Mindful of those who are unable to speak for themselves; our Non-Two Legged Relations and the Future Generations.

It's about walking on the Canka Luta Waste Behind the Cannunpa and the ceremonies.

It's about Mindfulness and Respect. It's about Honesty and owning up to my foibles.

It's about: Mi Takuye Oyacin

Friday, September 4, 2015

SENATE Voted Against 93% of the U.S. Consumers




On July 23, 275 members of the U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of H.R. 1599, the DARK (Deny Americans the Right to Know) Act. 

They voted against the 93 percent of Americans who are in favor of mandatory labeling of GMOs. 

They voted against you. 

Now it’s up to the Senate to stop this bill in it’s tracks. 

But senators need to hear from us. TAKE ACTION! 
Tell your senators to vote NO on the DARK Act: 
http://orgcns.org/1Drsbit

#StopTheDARKAct #RightToKnow #GMO #Ag

Personal Responsibility

Generating Stations Are Close to In-Water Recreation

This has been a popular swimming spot for well over 100 years...you know full well that kids being kids will continue to swim here even if the hydro dam is built.goes into operation. 

You can not escape the suction of the blades while in operation..folks will die. 

Why is the Ontario gov so determined to ram this through??? 

Approval has been given even without a full environmental assessment being done AS IS THE LAW!!!


Aug182015

Summary
It would be unpredented to build a hydro-electric generating station this close to public and private docks, in-water recreational areas, and residences. Yet since their environmental approval, the proponent has changed their plans to be even more dangerous. The proponent has not provided any information on how they would mitigate this extreme danger.
Detail
Visiting 29 similarly-sized hydro-electric generating stations in Southern Ontario shows that none have in-water recreation so close to their intakes or tailraces. Not only has the proponent not told the public how they could operate this proposed station safely, since their environmental approval they have made several design changes that would make their station even more dangerous. Closely looking at the shorelines, intake, tailrace, and neighbours upstream and downstream for these 29 hydro-electric generating stations in Ontario shows that for ALL:
  • There are NO public or private docks upstream or downstream.
  • There are NO in-water recreational activities, such as swimming, boating, or Scuba diving upsteam or downstream.
Some believe the proposed generating station is justified as there a generating station operated at this site more than two generations ago. But the proposed generating station would have over 11 TIMES the flow, more than 14 times the output, and have more than 25 TIMES the footprint. Consider this:
  • A car idling past you at 5 km/h in a parking lot is quite safe, but a car driving 11 times faster, 55 km/h, is lethal.
  • A breeze of 10 to 15 km/h is harmless, but 11 times that would be a deadly hurricane.
  • The 70 l/m water supply to your house is great for watering the lawn, but 11 times this is used for riot control water cannons.
The stations are listed below, all are in southern Ontario. Click on the links to see the station, the view upstream, and the view downstream. You can see a map of the location of these stations here, or if you have Google Earth installed, you can pan and zoom to each by clicking here.
  1. South River generating stationupstream and downstream.
  2. High Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  3. Wilson’s Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  4. Bracebridge Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  5. Matthias Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  6. Trethewey Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  7. Hanna Chute generating stationupstream and downstream.
  8. Muskoka South Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  9. Wasdell Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  10. Bancroft generating stationupstream and downstream.
  11. Minden generating stationupstream and downstream.
  12. Elliot Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  13. Fenelon Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  14. Auburn generating stationupstream and downstream.
  15. London Street generating stationupstream and downstream.
  16. Marmora generating stationupstream and downstream.
  17. Healey Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  18. Campbellford generating stationupstream and downstream.
  19. Seymour generating stationupstream and downstream.
  20. Ranney Falls generating stationupstream and downstream.
  21. Hagues Reach generating stationupstream and downstream.
  22. Meyersburg generating stationupstream and downstream.
  23. Sills Island generating stationupstream and downstream.
  24. Frankford generating stationupstream and downstream.
  25. Batawa generating stationupstream and downstream.
  26. Glen Miller generating stationupstream and downstream.
  27. Sidney generating stationupstream and downstream.
  28. Fletcher’s Horse World generating stationupstream and downstream.
  29. Heywood generating stationupstream and downstream.
The photograph below (click for a larger view) shows the Bala north falls, as viewed eastward from the Town Docks on the Moon River. The proposed generating station would be just past the Bala north dam. So not only would the proposed generating station be directly adjacent to the very popular in-water recreational area at the usually-serene Bala north falls, but also within 50 m of these private docks, and within 100 m of the only public dock on the Moon River. The proposed generating station, would fill the entire Crown land site with concrete, would tower five stories above the Moon River, yet be directly adjacent to the Township’s land directly to the south, which has been designated under the Ontario Heritage Act for its views. The proponent’s plans do not fit with this site.
The photograph below shows the area upstream of the intake for the proposed generating station, which would have a 30′-wide x 30′-deep intake drawing tons of water per second. Anyone near it would be held underwater until they drowned.
  • Just upstream of the safety boom is both the portage where children learning how to canoe from local summer camps get in and out of their canoes. Just upstream of that are the docks for Purk’s Place which rents canoes and kayaks, certainly falling out of a canoe or kayak there would be comment.
  • To the right and just upstream of the railway bridge is Diver’s Point, from which Scuba diving is very popular.
  • To the left and just usptream of the railway bridge are the Town Docks on Bala Bay. The wind, or motors stalling would result in boats being drown towards this safety boom, and extremely treacherous place to be. For more than 100 years, the annual Bala Regatta is held at these docks, yet another fun activity that would become life-and-death dangerous due to the proposed generating station’s intake.

The annotated drawing below (click for a larger view) shows the proximity of the treacherously fast and turbulent water entering and exiting the proposed generating station relative to the in-water recreational areas.
Conclusion
It would be unprecedented and irresponsibly dangerous to locate a hydro-electric generating station so close to so many in-water recreational areas in Bala.
Fencing and signage would not be effective as; private dock owners have a right to safety access the water, people would still access the falls by boat, the portage and the boat rental docks are just upstream of the proposed intake which would become extremely dangerous, and the wind and stalled motors would result in boats from the upstream public docks being drawn to the proposed station’s intake.
The proposed station would operate at its maximum capacity an average of 21 days every summer, drawing tons of water per second through its intake, which would hold anyone nearby under water until they drowned.
The proponent has not only stated they have no plans to fence off the area in an attempt to keep people safe, but they received environmental approval they have increased the minimum flow, increased the cycling flow, and increased the size of their proposed generating station, all of which add to the dangers.
That is, the proponent has not told the public how they would operate their proposed generating station safely.

Thursday, September 3, 2015

WWF ♥ Monsanto

http://althealthworks.com/7527/monsanto-world-wildlife-fund-team-up-to-greenwash-the-amazon-rainforest-with-monsantos-gmo-soy/?c=ngr

Monsanto, World Wildlife Fund Team Up to Greenwash the Amazon Rainforest With GMOs

- See more at: http://althealthworks.com/7527/monsanto-world-wildlife-fund-team-up-to-greenwash-the-amazon-rainforest-with-monsantos-gmo-soy/?c=ngr#sthash.iq7Ozo3C.dpuf

monsanto gmo soy rainforest

In today’s day and age there are so many charities and foundations out there that choosing the right ones to support, and to trust for that matter, can be especially problematic.
A lot of people just give to the ones that are best known like the WWF, Susan G. Komen and others without knowing where their money really goes. 
While most charities do their fair share of good work, they also can have plenty of dark secrets.
Some are money hoarders whose CEOs bring home the big bucks while spending comparatively little on research or actual work on the ground.
Others are simply too bloated and internally divided to be effective.
And still others have been getting away with far worse: they spend their time fraternizing with the enemies causing the very same problems they’ve been been supposedly working to solve for decades.
The WWF-Monsanto Connection
With its signature panda logo and history of doing good work on behalf of animal welfare across the globe, the World Wildlife Fund For Nature (WWF) has become one of the most recognizable charities of all-time.
Started in 1961, its stated mission is to conserve ecologically important regions and their wildlife.
But if that’s their true aim, then why has the WWF partnered with one of the most notorious nature killers in the world, Monsanto, whose products have been blamed for widespread monarch butterfly and honeybee deaths?
The world’s favorite wildlife charity was called out in a recent book titled ‘PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF,’ an exposé from German journalist and filmmaker Wilfried Huismann on everything from questionably high salaries to the organization’s ties to — you guessed it — the Big “M,” agrochemical giant Monsanto.
The book was a sequel of sorts to Huismann’s documentary ‘The Silence of the Pandas’ about the skeleton’s in the WWF’s closet.
A book titled 'PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF' was released in fall 2014. Click here to learn more.
A book titled ‘PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF’ was released in fall 2014. Click here to learn more.
The book immediately became a best-seller when it hit store shelves in 2012, but it almost never even saw the light of day because of opposition by the WWF’s legal team.
Terrified of the allegations within linking them to everything from commando hit squads in Africa to promoting Monsanto’s GMO crops, the WWF managed to stop the sale of the book for several weeks due to a massive campaign.
A series of lawsuits followed, but they were ultimately unable to prevent Huismann’s controversial book from being released.

Contained within the book within is a cavalcade of secrets including WWF’s relationship with Monsanto, whom the WWF admitted they took money from according to one German newspaper.
As stated on the website GMWatch, the friendly panda logo-clad charity actually collaborated with Monsanto to create something called the “Round Table on Responsible Soy.”
The campaign has been criticized as being a covert exercise in Monsanto’s patented brand of “greenwashing,” which calls GMO soy a “responsible” choice for protecting the environment despite much independent evidence to the contrary.
In other words, the countless people across the world who donate 20 bucks or more per month to the WWF are actually funding a charity with ties to what many call the most evil corporation in the world.
Despite mass protests, the WWF has refused to back down from their support of Monsanto’s genetically engineered soy and continues to post the Monsanto-approved campaign on its website.
GMO Soy: A Grave Threat to the Amazon Rainforest
While most GMO crops are grown in just six countries, two South American giants, Brazil and Argentina, have become hotbeds for soy production, with most of it being grown with genetically modified seeds from Monsanto and other companies.
The native Amazon Rainforest and other lands have suffered at the hands of the GMO soy boom: between 2007 and 2008 almost 3 million acres of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest was destroyed because of illegal logging, soy plantations and cattle ranching.
The grave situation led to a documentary release by Greenpeace titled ‘Soy: In the Name of Progress’ which you can watch at the bottom of this article.
According to the chart below from GMO Compass, Brazil’s soy industry has been virtually taken over by GMOs, which critics say threaten biodiversity in the rich and vitally important Amazon Rainforest.

gmo soy
Cultivation of GMO soy worldwide according to GMO Compass. Brazil is now at 90+% with much of it threatening biodiversity in the Amazon Rainforest.

The clearing of new areas of rainforest land for GMO soy has decreased in recent years thanks in large part to grassroots boycotts, but large-scale plantings have continued, as soy is especially valuable for use in feed for chickens, cows and other animals that are consumed for food.
Spreading the Word: WWF and Monsanto
So, what can we do?
For now, the best option is to spread the word and expose the truth, in hopes of a day when we can actually trust our charities to do the right thing. 
If you support WWF with your dollars or know anyone else who does, please share this article and consider finding another way to help make a difference.
We need all the help we can get, that much is for sure. 
- See more at: http://althealthworks.com/7527/monsanto-world-wildlife-fund-team-up-to-greenwash-the-amazon-rainforest-with-monsantos-gmo-soy/?c=ngr#sthash.iq7Ozo3C.dpuf