TransportationSafetyBoardOfCanada
Oil-carrying rail cars burn outside Gogama, Ontario Saturday night. Photo credit: Transportation Safety Board of Canada

Once again this weekend, we saw scenes of tanker cars 
strewn across the landscape on their sides emitting 
huge billows of smoke and fire. On Saturday a 94-car
train carrying Alberta tar sands oil derailed two miles 
outside Gogama, Ontario, with at least 35 cars going
off the rails and at least seven igniting. Five cars 
landed in the Makami River, prompting a warning
to residents not to drink the water as well as to stay
inside to avoid possible toxic effects from the fire.
It follows fiery derailments of the so-called oil bomb trains 
carrying volatile crude oil that have occurred in Illinois
West Virginia and Ontario since the beginning of the year. 
In each of those cases, only about half a dozen cars derailed, 
making the Gogama derailment the biggest so far this year.
Gogama is about 60 miles north of the remote, unpopulated 
area outside Timmins, Ontario where 
a derailment occurred Feb. 14. And while Gogama itself is 
remote, it’s not unpopulated: the town has almost 400 
residents and the nearby Mattagami First Nation 
community, and it’s a major center of outdoor tourism. 
The tracks the train was traveling go through the town, 
raising the specter of another tragedy like the one that 
killed 47 people and leveled much of the town of 
Lac-Mégantic, Quebec in July 2013.




















“It’s frightening and nerve-wracking, especially after 
what happened in Quebec,” Roxanne Veronneau, 
owner of the Gogama Village Inn, 
told the Toronto Star. “People here are on pins and 
needles. The tracks run right through town. I’m sure 
that there’s going to be a lot of talk afterward that this 
shouldn’t be in the middle of our town.”


















Mattagami chief Walter Naveau 
told northern Ontario news outlet Village Media that he 
had met with representatives from CN, the company 
whose train derailed and wasn’t comfortable with 
their reassurances.
“They’re saying it’s okay, and yet why are some of my 
band members feeling it in their chests and tasting it 
in their mouths?” said Naveau. “I’m very angry at CN 
right now, to put it mildly.”
He said he was concerned about the potential impact of 
oil spilling into the river. “The water is coming our way 
and that’s going to harm our fish habitat and tourist 
habitat,” he said.
View image on Twitter


















“Anywhere you’re going to see a major spill of oil and 
chemicals onto the ground you’re going to see 
permanent contamination of the ecosystem nearby,” 
Adam Scott, climate and energy program manager
for Canadian nonprofit advocacy group 
Environmental Defencetold Canada’s National Post
“They almost never are able to clean up all of the oil 
released in a spill like this and it’s much worse even 
when there’s a direct spill into a river because the oil 
gets moved down the river and the chemicals can 
spread. 

View image on Twitter
















Each derailment suggests we’re a little closer to 
another Lac-Mégantic—or worse.
recent study from the Center for Biological Diversity 
called Runaway Risks found that, with the 40-fold 
increase in rail cars carrying oil since 2008, 25 million 
people now live within a mile of tracks carrying these 
dangerous trains.
“Before one more derailment, fire, oil spill and one more
 life lost, we need a moratorium on oil trains and we need 
it now,” said Center for Biological Diversity senior scientist 
Mollie Matteson. “The oil and railroad industries are 
playing Russian roulette with people’s lives and our 
environment, and the Obama administration needs to 
put a stop to it. Today we have another oil train wreck 
in Canada, while the derailed oil train in Illinois is still 
smoldering. Where’s it going to happen next? Chicago? 
Seattle? The Obama administration has the power to 
put an end to this madness and it needs to act now 
because quite literally, people’s lives are on the line.”
While both Transport Canada and the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have 
proposed new safety regulations for oil trains, 
including phasing out the old puncture-prone 
DOT-111 oil tankers, many of the recent 
derailment fires, including the one in Gogama, 
involved the new and supposedly safer CPC 1232 
cars. And the industry is lobbying for a longer 
time frame in which to phase out the old cars. 
“The cars involved in this incident are new models, 
compliant with the latest federal regulations, 
yet they still failed to prevent this incident,”
 said Glenn Thibeault, who represents the 
Gogama area in the Ontario legislature.
“It’s basically guaranteed to happen again; this is 
not an isolated incident,” Scott told The Star
“So until something dramatic is done, we’re going 
to see this continuing over and over again.”